The three Allahabad high court bench judges announced the verdict in the Ayodhya case. After each case has gone in favor of Hindus. The verdict on the Ayodhya dispute will be available at the official website of the Allahabad High Court – www.allahabadhighcourt.in an official said Thursday.
“A special website will be available as the main point of the questions, the operative part of the order, and the final Ayodhya verdict is made available,” the registrar of the Lucknow bench said in a statement here.
The Allahabad High Court today ruled by majority that the disputed land in Ayodhya is divided into three parts to be distributed among the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the party for ‘Ram Lalla “, said lawyers.
“Press / Media are asked not to speculate about the verdict before they have a copy of the problems answered by the court and the operative part of the order,” he said. The ownership of the disputed area be divided into three parts: the site of Ram lala idol to Ram, the Nirmohi Akhara Rasoi Sita and Ram Chabutara, Sunni Wakf Board gets the rest.
The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court is set to give its verdict in the 60-year-old Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi dispute case. The dispute at hand is whether the 2.7 hectares of disputed Babri Masjid land which was before it was demolished 6 December 1992, belongs to the Sunni Waqf Board or the Central to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha. Total 90 days has been given to each party to file case in Supreme Court.
The verdict in the title suit will be a landmark one in particular for Justice DV Sharma, who is set to demit office on Friday. The other judges on the Lucknow bench of the High Court is SU Khan and Sudhir Agarwal.Sunni Waqf Board case of 1961 is totally rejected. Case was to remove the deities of Hindu gods in the Masjid.
Land to be divided into three parts. Each part will be hosted by Ram Lalla, Nirmohi Akhara and Muslims.
All three judges agreed that the place was scared for Hindus and Rama were born here only. Crucial statement.
Total of 90 days has been given to each of the parties to file the case in the Supreme Court.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony regardless of the verdict.
S U Khan Ayodhya Judgement : Click here
Sudhir Agarwal Ayodhya Judgement : Click here
Dharam Veer Sharma Ayodhya Judgement: Click here For First copy | Click here For Second copy
WHILE HON’LE JUSTICE SHARMA HAS DECLAIRED ALL THE LAND OF LORD RAM AND ON THE BASIS OF LIMITATION ACTHON’LE JUSTICE AGRAWAL SAID BOTH OF THE CLAIMS OF NIRMOHI AKHADA AND THE WAQF BOARD’S ARE TIME BARRED AND HENCE DISMISSED, SO BY THE POWER OF MEJORITY, ALL THE AREA OF DISPUTED LAND REMAINS ONLY FOR LORD RAM. WHAT WOULD BE THE EFFECT OF BEING TIMEBARRED THE SUITS OF THESE TWO PARTIES ??????????????